Al-Hilal can afford Bruno Fernandes and need his creativity, but full foreign-player slots and reports they won’t renew interest make a January move unlikely.
Read how the Football Whispers Index works.
The money works; the timing is harder
Tuttomercatoweb’s Andrea Losapio reported on 2 November that Al-Hilal were preparing a €55 million (£45 million) January bid. Goal, Football365 and OneFootball also cited the report, but no club has made an official offer. Jacobs directly disputed the suggestion that Al-Hilal would make a move this winter.
The reported fee is less than half the up-to-£100 million Al-Hilal were said to have offered in 2025, when Fernandes turned them down. It’s affordable for a club that says its 2024–25 revenue exceeded $340 million—a figure it says would have placed it among the top 20 in Deloitte’s Football Money League. The question is whether Al-Hilal can make room for him. Jacobs says all their foreign-player slots are full.
The Index gives financial viability **17/25** and buying-club need **15/20**. Al-Hilal have just one specialist attacking midfielder, 20-year-old Saimon Bouabré; Sergej Milinković-Savić and Mohamed Kanno are listed as central midfielders. Fernandes would bring the creative profile they lack. In 2025–26, he scored nine goals and recorded 21 assists in 35 Premier League starts, a record assist return for the competition.
That production makes the fit easy to understand. But Fernandes turned 32 on 8 September, so he’d be a short-term answer rather than a long-term project.
Fernandes and United have their own reasons to wait
Fernandes rejected Al-Hilal in June 2025 after discussing the offer with his family, saying he wanted to compete at the highest level. United finished third in the Premier League last season and returned to the Champions League; Al-Hilal compete in the AFC Champions League Elite. He has also said it hurts him that United would have let him leave.
His relationship with United has looked strained. Michael Carrick held frank talks with him in late October after a public disagreement over tactics during a winless run. Contract discussions have also stalled: The Mirror reported in June that United paused negotiations, and David Ornstein described the talks as an impasse on 13 September. The Index assigns player motivation **5/15**.
There’s a financial incentive for United to consider a sale, but the club has time on its side. Fernandes’s contract runs to 30 June 2027, and United have an option to extend it by a year. Keith Wyness expects United to exercise that option before selling later; Football Insider reported on 26 October that the club was weighing a sale next summer. The Index scores selling-club incentive at **9/20**.
Fernandes has three goals and one assist in his first eight league starts of 2026–27, down from 21 assists in 35 starts last season. That dip may affect United’s thinking, though it doesn’t settle the question of when they’d sell.
Why the January story remains a long shot
The Index gives market momentum **0/20**. That’s the clearest sign of the gap between a transfer that makes sense on paper and one supported by current reporting: the bid story traces to a single report, Jacobs has denied a winter revival, and the reported squad registration limit presents a practical barrier.
AC Milan, now managed by Ruben Amorim, are monitoring Fernandes, but no club has made an offer. A European club offering Champions League football could fit the ambition Fernandes cited when he rejected Al-Hilal, though it’s unclear whether such an offer will emerge.
For January, the deal looks unlikely. Al-Hilal would need to open a foreign-player spot, and Fernandes would need to reconsider his United future. A move becomes more plausible if the contract impasse continues and United opt to sell next summer. The 45/100 score is for the winter window; United’s one-year option leaves the summer question open.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.